Radiometric dating and the age of the earth
The age of the carbon in the rock is different from that of the carbon in the air and makes carbon dating data for those organisms inaccurate under the assumptions normally used for carbon dating.This restriction extends to animals that consume seafood in their diet.The only dating methods discussed (over and over) by evolution-believing scientists and the mass media are those that supposedly "prove" that the earth is billions of years old.
His Ph D thesis was on isotope ratios in meteorites, including surface exposure dating.
Many Christians have been led to distrust radiometric dating and are completely unaware of the great number of laboratory measurements that have shown these methods to be consistent.
Many are also unaware that Bible-believing Christians are among those actively involved in radiometric dating.
There are many ways to keep track of time, the most reliable of which is to use actual records such as counting hours, days, weeks, and years.
However, when we speak of the distant past, there are no historical records and thus no verifiable way to prove that a certain 'date' is correct.It has become increasingly clear that these radiometric dating techniques agree with each other and as a whole, present a coherent picture in which the Earth was created a very long time ago.